Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections.

June 16, 2015 at 9:27 pm

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2383-99.

Chen AF1, Wessel CB, Rao N.

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common organism responsible for orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs). Patients who are carriers for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have a higher likelihood of having invasive S. aureus infections. Although some have advocated screening for S. aureus and decolonizing it is unclear whether these efforts reduce SSIs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:

The purposes of this study were to determine

(1) whether S. aureus screening and decolonization reduce SSIs in orthopaedic patients and

(2) if implementing this protocol is cost-effective.

METHODS:

Studies for this systematic review were identified by searching PubMed, which includes MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE.com (1974-present), and the Cochrane Library’s (John Wiley & Sons) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTAD), and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED). Comprehensive literature searches were developed using EMTREE, MeSH, and keywords for each of the search concepts of decolonization, MRSA, and orthopedics/orthopedic surgery. Studies published before 1968 were excluded. We analyzed 19 studies examining the ability of the decolonization protocol to reduce SSIs and 10 studies detailing the cost-effectiveness of S. aureus screening and decolonization.

RESULTS:

All 19 studies showed a reduction in SSIs or wound complications by instituting a S. aureus screening and decolonization protocol in elective orthopaedic (total joints, spine, and sports) and trauma patients. The S. aureus screening and decolonization protocol also saved costs in orthopaedic patients when comparing the costs of screening and decolonization with the reduction of SSIs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preoperative screening and decolonization of S. aureus in orthopaedic patients is a cost-effective means to reduce SSIs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PDF

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676622/pdf/11999_2013_Article_2875.pdf

Entry filed under: Antimicrobianos, Bacterias, Bacteriemias, Infecciones osteo-articulares-musculares, Infecciones relacionadas a prótesis, Infecciones sitio quirurgico, Profilaxis Antibiótica en Cirugía - PAC, Resistencia bacteriana. Tags: .

Predictors of clinical and microbiological treatment failure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study in a region with low MRSA prevalence. Central venous catheter-related bacteremia due to Tsukamurella species in the immunocompromised host: a case series and review of the literature.


Calendar

June 2015
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Most Recent Posts


%d bloggers like this: