Archive for September 29, 2016

Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.

N Engl J Med 2016 Sep 29; 375:1231

Alan T.N. Tita, M.D., Ph.D., Jeff M. Szychowski, Ph.D., Kim Boggess, M.D., George Saade, M.D., Sherri Longo, M.D., Erin Clark, M.D., Sean Esplin, M.D., Kirsten Cleary, M.D., Ron Wapner, M.D., Kellett Letson, M.D., Michelle Owens, M.D., Adi Abramovici, M.D., Namasivayam Ambalavanan, M.D., Gary Cutter, Ph.D., and William Andrews, M.D., Ph.D., for the C/SOAP Trial Consortium*


The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section.


In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks.


The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P=0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P=0.63).


Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP number, NCT01235546.)




N Engl J Med 2016 Sep 29; 375:1284

Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery — when broader is better.

Weinstein RA and Boyer KM

Approximately 4 million babies are born each year in the United States. Of these infants, about a third are delivered by cesarean section. One of the many concerns about cesarean deliveries is the high risk of maternal infectious complications, which are 5 to 10 times more frequent than with vaginal deliveries.1 During cesarean delivery, the endometrial cavity and operative field may be seeded with pathogens, carried from the birth canal or the skin, that put mothers at risk for endometritis (incidence without prophylaxis, 4 to 18%) and of surgical-site infections (incidence without prophylaxis, 7 to 10%).2 To reduce these risks, prophylactic administration of an intravenous periprocedural antibiotic, usually cefazolin, is routinely recommended. Such an infusion reduces these rates by about half.3 Stringent adherence to infection-control protocols and broader antibiotic regimens might yield further reductions……



September 29, 2016 at 8:19 am


September 2016
« Aug   Oct »

Posts by Month

Posts by Category