Risk of Reinfection After Treatment of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

December 1, 2016 at 8:23 am

Journal of Arthroplasty September 2016 V.31 N.9 P.156–161

Adam R. Cochran, Kevin L. Ong, Edmund Lau, Michael A. Mont, Arthur L. Malkani

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of subsequent reinfections after initial treatment of an infected total knee arthroplasty, identify risk factors leading to reinfection, and compare results among the varying treatment modalities.

Methods

A total of 1,493,924 primary TKA patients were identified from the Medicare data between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011. Patients who encountered periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after TKA were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 996.66. The risk of subsequent PJI was stratified based on the first-line treatment and compared between the various first-line treatment groups.

Results

A total of 16,622 patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with PJI. The Kaplan-Meier risk of PJI was 0.77% at 1 year and 1.58% at 6 years. Age (P < .001), Charlson score (P < .001), hospital control (P < .001), race (P = .036), census region (P = .031), gender (P < .001) were identified as risk factors for PJI. Of the PJI patients, 20.8% (n = 2806) were treated with incision and drainage (I&D), 15.9% (n = 2150) treated with I&D and liner exchange, 22.7% (n = 3069) treated with 1-stage revision, 39.7% (n = 5364) treated with 2-stage revision, and 0.98% (n = 132) treated with amputation. After first-line treatment, 26% of patients with PJI had a subsequent PJI. Patients undergoing I&D as a first-line treatment had the highest risk of reinfection, with risks of 28.2% at 1 year and 43.2% at 6 years. One-stage revision patients had 33.9% greater adjusted risk of reinfection than 2-stage revision patients (P < .001).

Conclusion

Two-stage reimplantation, despite 19% recurrence, had the highest success rate. Given the higher failure rates of I&D and single-stage revisions, guidelines need to be established for their specific indications.

PDF

http://www.arthroplastyjournal.org/article/S0883-5403(16)00304-1/pdf

Entry filed under: Bacterias, Antimicrobianos, Resistencia bacteriana, Infecciones osteo-articulares-musculares, Infecciones nosocomiales, Metodos diagnosticos, Sepsis, Infecciones sitio quirurgico, Infecciones relacionadas a prótesis, Epidemiología, Update, Health Care-Associated Infections, Biología Molecular, FIEBRE en el POSTOPERATORIO. Tags: .

Disseminated Mycobacterium abscessus Infection Following Septic Arthritis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Severely Obese Patients Have a Higher Risk of Infection After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty


Calendar

December 2016
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Most Recent Posts


%d bloggers like this: