Posts filed under ‘Biología Molecular’

Fiebre de origen desconocido en pacientes HIV positivos

ANALES DE MEDICINA INTERNA (Madrid), 2001 V.18 N.4 P.181-186

BARBA, J. GÓMEZ-RODRIGO, J. MARCO, P. RONDÓN, G. EROLES,

LÓPEZ-VARAS, R. TORRES

Departamento de Medicina Interna y Enfermedades Infecciosas. Hospital Severo Ochoa.

Leganés. Madrid

RESUMEN

Objetivos

Describir la presentación clínica y la utilidad de los de tests diagnósticos habitualmente recomendados en el estudio de la fiebre de origen desconocido (FOD) en los pacientes VIH positivos.

Pacientes y métodos

Incluimos en el estudio a los 54 pacientes con infección por el VIH que ingresaron en nuestro Hospital por FOD durante un periodo de 23 meses. La FOD fue definida de acuerdo con los criterios modificados de Petersdorf´s.

Resultados

La causa de la fiebre se identificó en 48 casos (89%). La tuberculosis, la micobacteriosis atípica y la leishmaniasis pueden explicar el 68% de los casos. El aspirado de médula ósea, la punción aspiración o la biopsia de los ganglios linfáticos y los cultivos para micobacterias fueron las pruebas diagnósticas más rentables.

Conclusiones

La infección por micobacterias debe ser el primer diagnóstico de sospecha en los pacientes VIH positivos con FOD. Es posible precedir el diagnóstico de tuberculosis con una alta precisión (90,5%) con un modelo de regresión logística basado en datos clínicos y analíticos fácilmente obtenibles.

PDF

http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/ami/v18n4/original2.pdf

Advertisements

November 21, 2017 at 8:41 am

FIEBRE DE ORIGEN DESCONOCIDO EN PACIENTES INFECTADOS CON EL VIRUS DE LA INMUNODEFICIENCIA HUMANA

MEDICINA (Buenos Aires) 2000 V.60 N.5 P.623-630

SEBASTIAN A. MATHURIN, SERGIO LUPO, HECTOR O. ALONSO

Primera Cátedra de Clínica Médica y Terapéutica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Hospital Provincial del Centenario, Rosario

La fiebre de origen desconocido (FOD) es frecuente en pacientes infectados por el HIV. Existen numerosas causas que pueden originar FOD y su frecuencia relativa depende de múltiples factores. Usualmente se debe a una infección oportunista agregada.

La evaluación diagnóstica depende de la presentación clínica y del estadio de la infección por HIV. Existe una asociación entre el recuento de linfocitos CD4 y ciertas enfermedades oportunistas que pueden originar FOD.

El área geográfica y la prevalencia local de infecciones endémicas es un factor importante. Las infecciones de distribución mundial como la tuberculosis siempre deben ser consideradas y otras como la histoplasmosis diseminada son causa frecuente de FOD en áreas endémicas como la Argentina.

La mayor utilidad diagnóstica se obtiene con los cultivos de esputo y hemocultivos para micobacterias, y entre los métodos invasivos con cultivos a partir de la aspiración/biopsia de ganglio linfático, la biopsia de médula ósea y la biopsia hepática.

La eficacia del tratamiento empírico ha sido documentada en ciertas infecciones.

FULL TEXT

http://www.medicinabuenosaires.com/revistas/vol60-00/5-1/fiebredeorigen.htm

November 21, 2017 at 8:34 am

Diagnostic Accuracy of PCR Alone and Compared to Urinary Antigen Testing for Detection of Legionella spp.-Systematic Review.

J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Feb;54(2):401-11.

Avni T1, Bieber A2, Green H2, Steinmetz T2, Leibovici L2, Paul M3.

Author information

1 Medicine E, Beilinson Hospital and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel tomerav@clalit.org.il

2 Medicine E, Beilinson Hospital and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

3 Infectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Medical Center and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Tehnion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Abstract

The diagnosis of Legionnaires’ disease (LD) is based on the isolation of Legionella spp., a 4-fold rise in antibodies, a positive urinary antigen (UA), or direct immunofluorescence tests. PCR is not accepted as a diagnostic tool for LD. This systematic review assesses the diagnostic accuracy of PCR in various clinical samples with a direct comparison versus UA. We included prospective or retrospective cohort and case-control studies. Studies were included if they used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention consensus definition criteria of LD or a similar one, assessed only patients with clinical pneumonia, and reported data for all true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative results. Two reviewers abstracted data independently. Risk of bias was assessed using Quadas-2. Summary sensitivity and specificity values were estimated using a bivariate model and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Thirty-eight studies were included. A total of 653 patients had confirmed LD, and 3,593 patients had pneumonia due to other pathogens. The methodological quality of the studies as assessed by the Quadas-2 tool was poor to fair. The summary sensitivity and specificity values for diagnosis of LD in respiratory samples were 97.4% (95% CI, 91.1% to 99.2%) and 98.6% (95% CI, 97.4% to 99.3%), respectively. These results were mainly unchanged by any covariates tested and subgroup analysis. The diagnostic performance of PCR in respiratory samples was much better than that of UA. Compared to UA, PCR in respiratory samples (especially in sputum samples or swabs) revealed a significant advantage in sensitivity and an additional diagnosis of 18% to 30% of LD cases. The diagnostic performance of PCR in respiratory samples was excellent and preferable to that of the UA. Results were independent on the covariate tested. PCR in respiratory samples should be regarded as a valid tool for the diagnosis of LD.

PDF

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733173/pdf/zjm401.pdf

November 20, 2017 at 11:32 am

2007 LEGIONELLA and the Prevention of LEGIONELLOSIS – WHO MANUAL 276 pags

World Health Organization 2007

Edited by:

Jamie Bartram, Yves Chartier, John V Lee,

Kathy Pond and Susanne Surman-Lee

PDF

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/emerging/legionella.pdf

November 20, 2017 at 11:31 am

LEPTOSPIROSIS – Guia para el Equipo de Salud – Ministerio Salud de la Nación Argentina

LEPTOSPIROSIS 

Guia para el Equipo de Salud – Ministerio Salud de la Nación Argentina

Abril 2014

  1. Introducción
  2. Manifestaciones clínicas
  3. ¿Cuándo sospechar leptospirosis?
  4. ¿Cómo confirmar leptospirosis?
  5. ¿Cómo notificar el caso de leptospirosis?
  6. ¿Cómo se trata el paciente con leptospirosis?
  7. Flujograma de manejo de casos sospechosos de leptospirosis
  8. Diagnóstico diferencial
  9. ¿Qué hacer si se confirma?
  10. ¿Cómo se tratan los casos caninos de leptospirosis?
  11. Prevención de la leptospirosis en la familia y la comunidad

PDF

http://www.msal.gob.ar/images/stories/bes/graficos/0000000489cnt-guia-medica-leptospirosis.pdf

November 18, 2017 at 10:05 am

LEPTOSPIROSIS – Puesta al día

Revista Chilena de Infectología Junio 2007 V.24 N.3 P.220-226

Zunino, P. Pizarro

We review epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic aspects of leptospirosis. In relation to the epidemiology it is worth noting the importance of recreational and occupational risk factors, as well as the lack of date available in Chile before the year 2000, when leptospirosis became the object of epidemiological surveillance. There are many forms of clinical presentations for this disease and often signs and symptoms may be nonspecific. Thus, differential diagnosis must include many clinical entities. Laboratory diagnosis, on the other hand, is complex and not widely available. Although still controversial, a literature review supports antimicrobial treatment, with different antibiotics to choose from.

PDF

http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rci/v24n3/art08.pdf

November 18, 2017 at 10:04 am

Leptospirosis

Clinical Microbiology Reviews April 2001 V.14 N.2 P.296-326

REVIEW

Paul N. Levett

University of the West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine & Research, and Leptospira Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Barbados

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic infection with a much greater incidence in tropical regions and has now been identified as one of the emerging infectious diseases. The epidemiology of leptospirosis has been modified by changes in animal husbandry, climate, and human behavior. Resurgent interest in leptospirosis has resulted from large outbreaks that have received significant publicity. The development of simpler, rapid assays for diagnosis has been based largely on the recognition that early initiation of antibiotic therapy is important in acute disease but also on the need for assays which can be used more widely. In this review, the complex taxonomy of leptospires, previously based on serology and recently modified by a genotypic classification, is discussed, and the clinical and epidemiological value of molecular diagnosis and typing is also evaluated.

abstract

http://cmr.asm.org/content/14/2/296.abstract

PDF

http://cmr.asm.org/content/14/2/296.full.pdf+html

November 18, 2017 at 10:02 am

Older Posts


Calendar

November 2017
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category