Posts filed under ‘Infecciones en neutropenicos’

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Adult Patients With Cancer-Related Immunosuppression: ASCO and IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 4:JCO1800374

Taplitz RA, Kennedy EB, Bow EJ, et al.

Purpose

To provide an updated joint ASCO/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline on antimicrobial prophylaxis for adult patients with immunosuppression associated with cancer and its treatment.

Methods

ASCO and IDSA convened an update Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of relevant studies from May 2011 to November 2016. The guideline recommendations were based on the review of evidence by the Expert Panel.

Results

Six new or updated meta-analyses and six new primary studies were added to the updated systematic review.

Recommendations

Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for patients who are at high risk of infection, including patients who are expected to have profound, protracted neutropenia, which is defined as < 100 neutrophils/µL for > 7 days or other risk factors. Herpes simplex virus–seropositive patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or leukemia induction therapy should receive nucleoside analog-based antiviral prophylaxis, such as acyclovir. Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens that are associated with a > 3.5% risk for pneumonia as a result of this organism (eg, those with ≥ 20 mg prednisone equivalents daily for ≥ 1 month or on the basis of purine analog usage). Treatment with a nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (eg, entecavir or tenofovir) is recommended for patients at high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation. Recommendations for vaccination and avoidance of prolonged contact with environments that have high concentrations of airborne fungal spores are also provided within the updated guideline. Additional information is available at http://www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

FULL TEXT

https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.18.00374

PDF (CLIC en PDF)

 

Advertisements

March 20, 2019 at 3:44 pm

Infections After Receipt of Bacterially Contaminated Umbilical Cord Blood–Derived Stem Cell Products for Other Than Hematopoietic or Immunologic Reconstitution — United States, 2018

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report December 21, 2018  V.67 N.50 P.1397–1399

Infections After Receipt of Bacterially Contaminated Umbilical Cord Blood–Derived Stem Cell Products for Other Than Hematopoietic or Immunologic Reconstitution — United States, 2018

The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved stem cell products are derived from umbilical cord blood, and their only approved use is hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution (1).

On September 17, 2018, the Texas Department of State Health Services received notification of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii bloodstream infections in three patients who had received injections or infusions of non-FDA–approved umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell products processed by Genetech, Inc., and distributed by Liveyon, LLC, for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution at an outpatient clinic on September 12.

Patient isolates of E. cloacae had identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns, suggesting a common source …

PDF

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/pdfs/mm6750a5-H.pdf

December 26, 2018 at 8:52 am

The era of multidrug-resistant microorganisms: Impact on febrile neutropenic patients

International Journal of Infectious Diseases August 2018 V.73 Supplement  P.15

C.C. Herrera, E. Cordova, L. Morganti, W. Cornistein, F. Garibaldi, N. Gomez, M. Badia, C. Rodriguez

Background

Antimicrobial treatment for febrile neutropenic (FN) patients has become a challenge due to the growing emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDR-MO). The characteristics of these infections vary depending on the geographical areas and the level of local resistance.

The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of the FN population due to oncological diseases and the incidence of MDR-MO.

Methods & Materials

Retrospective, observational and descriptive study from June 2015 to August 2017 in FN adults hospitalized at a public hospital of tertiary complexity in Buenos Aires city, Argentina. Demographic, clinical and microbiological characteristics were analyzed.

We included the following MDR-MO: extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), Acinetobacter baumanii, vancomicyn resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and Stenotrophomonas malthophilia.

Results

Thirty-two patients were included; 56% were women, the median age was 53 years old (range 18-75) and the average of time of hospitalization was 42 days. Sixteen percent of the patients had solid neoplasms and 84% haematological diseases. Of these, 56% were acute leukemias. Colonization by CPE or VRE was observed in a 59% of the patients.

There were 148 infectious episodes (IE) in 81 episodes of FN. Microbiological documentation was observed in 41% of the IE. Of them, MDR-MO were responsible for 25% of the episodes. The most frequent MDR-MO were: carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 47%, ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae 26%, Acinetobacter baumanii 16%, VRE 5% and Stenotrophomonas malthophilia 5%. MDR-MO were isolated from the following foci: bacteremia 47%; urinary infections 26%; pneumonia 11% and other 16%. Patients with MDR-MO had acute leukemia in a 67%. The median time of hospitalization was 61 days and 80% had colonization CPKP or VRE. Inadequate treatment for MDR-MO was observed in 63% of the cases and 12% for susceptible microorganisms (p < 0.01). The overall mortality was 45%: 53% for MDR-MO and 27% for susceptible microorganisms (p = ns).

Conclusion

MDR-MO infections were frequent in the studied population with predominance of bacteremia due to enterobacteria, especially CPE and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. According to these results MDR-MO should be taken into account for the empiric antimicrobial treatment in febrile neutropenic patients.

PDF

https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(18)33544-6/pdf

July 29, 2018 at 11:47 am

Bloodstream infections in cancer patients. Risk factors associated with mortality

International Journal of Infectious Diseases June 2018 V.71 P.59-64

Beda Islas-Muñoz, Patricia Volkow-Fernández, Cynthia Ibanes-Gutiérrez, Alberto Villamar-Ramírez, Diana Vilar-Compte, Patricia Cornejo-Juárez

Highlights

  • Bloodstream infections (BSI) cause severe complications in cancer patients.
  • Secondary BSI and central-related BSI were the most common in solid tumors.
  • Primary BSI and mucosal barrier injury BSI were described in hematological patients.
  • Mortality at 30-days was increased with multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
  • Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment in the first 24 h was related with mortality.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with mortality in cancer patients with bloodstream infections (BSI), analyzing multidrug resistant bacteria (MDR).

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study at a cancer referral center from August 2016 to July 2017, which included all BSI.

Results

4220 patients were tested with blood cultures; 496 were included. Mean age was 48 years. In 299 patients with solid tumors, secondary BSI and Central Line-Associated BSI (CLABSI) were the most common (55.9% and 31.8%, respectively). In 197 hematologic patients, primary and mucosal barrier injury (MBI) BSI were the main type (38.6%). Gram-negative were the most frequent bacteria (72.8%), with Escherichia coli occupying the first place (n = 210, 42.3%), 48% were Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producers, and 1.8% were resistant to carbapenems. Mortality at day 30, was 22%, but reached 70% when patients did not receive an appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that progression or relapse of the oncologic disease, inappropriate antimicrobial treatment, and having resistant bacteria were independently associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

Emergence of MDR bacteria is an important healthcare problem worldwide. Patients with BSI, particularly those patients with MDR bacteria have a higher mortality risk.

PDF

https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(18)30081-X/pdf

July 14, 2018 at 7:25 pm

Pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in critically ill patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Apr;57(4):1672-6.

Liu P1, Ruhnke M, Meersseman W, Paiva JA, Kantecki M, Damle B.

Author information

1 Clinical Pharmacology, Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients were assessed in this study and compared with historical data from a general patient population and healthy subjects. Intensive plasma sampling was performed over a dosing interval at steady state from 21 ICU patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis. All patients received the recommended dosing regimen (a 200-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by a daily 100-mg maintenance dose), except for a 54-year-old 240-kg female patient (who received a daily 150-mg maintenance dose instead). Plasma samples were assayed for anidulafungin using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters in ICU patients were calculated by a noncompartmental method. With the exclusion of the 240-kg patient, the median (minimum, maximum) age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of 20 ICU patients were 57 (39, 78) years, 65 (48, 106) kg, and 23.3 (16.2, 33.8) kg/m(2), respectively. The average anidulafungin area under the curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and clearance (CL) in 20 ICU patients were 92.7 mg · h/liter, 7.7 mg/liter, and 1.3 liters/h, respectively. The exposure in the 240-kg patient at a daily 150-mg dose was within the range observed in ICU patients overall. The average AUC(0-24) and Cmax in the general patient population and healthy subjects were 110.3 and 105.9 mg · h/liter and 7.2 and 7.0 mg/liter, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients appeared to be comparable to those in the general patient population and healthy subjects at the same dosing regimen.

PDF

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623353/pdf/zac1672.pdf

July 7, 2018 at 3:36 pm

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Clinical Infectious Diseases  March 1, 2009 V.48 N.5 P. 503-35.

Pappas PG1, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD; Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Author information

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0006, USA. pappas@uab.edu

Abstract

Guidelines for the management of patients with invasive candidiasis and mucosal candidiasis were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace the previous guidelines published in the 15 January 2004 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have or are at risk of these infections. Since 2004, several new antifungal agents have become available, and several new studies have been published relating to the treatment of candidemia, other forms of invasive candidiasis, and mucosal disease, including oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis. There are also recent prospective data on the prevention of invasive candidiasis in high-risk neonates and adults and on the empiric treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis in adults. This new information is incorporated into this revised document.

abstract

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/48/5/503/382619

PDF (CLIC en PDF)

July 7, 2018 at 3:34 pm

Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis.

N Engl J Med. June 14, 2007 V.356 N.24 P.2472-82.

Reboli AC1, Rotstein C, Pappas PG, Chapman SW, Kett DH, Kumar D, Betts R, Wible M, Goldstein BP, Schranz J, Krause DS, Walsh TJ; Anidulafungin Study Group.

Author information

1 University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA. reboli-annette@cooperhealth.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Anidulafungin, a new echinocandin, has potent activity against candida species. We compared anidulafungin with fluconazole in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial of treatment for invasive candidiasis.

METHODS:

Adults with invasive candidiasis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous anidulafungin or intravenous fluconazole. All patients could receive oral fluconazole after 10 days of intravenous therapy. The primary efficacy analysis assessed the global response (clinical and microbiologic) at the end of intravenous therapy in patients who had a positive baseline culture. Efficacy was also assessed at other time points.

RESULTS:

Eighty-nine percent of the 245 patients in the primary analysis had candidemia only. Candida albicans was isolated in 62% of the 245 patients. In vitro fluconazole resistance was infrequent. Most of the patients (97%) did not have neutropenia. At the end of intravenous therapy, treatment was successful in 75.6% of patients treated with anidulafungin, as compared with 60.2% of those treated with fluconazole (difference, 15.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9 to 27.0). The results were similar for other efficacy end points. The statistical analyses failed to show a “center effect”; when data from the site enrolling the largest number of patients were removed, success rates at the end of intravenous therapy were 73.2% in the anidulafungin group and 61.1% in the fluconazole group (difference, 12.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 25.3). The frequency and types of adverse events were similar in the two groups. The rate of death from all causes was 31% in the fluconazole group and 23% in the anidulafungin group (P=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS:

Anidulafungin was shown to be noninferior to fluconazole in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056368 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).

FULL TEXT

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa066906?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

PDF

https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa066906

July 7, 2018 at 3:31 pm

Older Posts


Calendar

May 2019
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category