Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

January 5, 2018 at 8:19 am

Journal of Clinical Microbiology January 2018 V.56 N.1

André Kriegeskorte, Evgeny A. Idelevich, Andreas Schlattmann, Franziska Layer, Birgit Strommenger, Olivier Denis, Gavin K. Paterson, Mark A. Holmes, Guido Werner and Karsten Becker

aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

bRobert-Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany

cLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

dRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom

eDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

fRobert-Koch-Institute, Wernigerode Branch, Wernigerode, Germany

Similar to mecA, mecC confers resistance against beta-lactams, leading to the phenotype of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, mecC-harboring MRSA strains pose special difficulties in their detection. The aim of this study was to assess and compare different phenotypic systems for screening, identification, and susceptibility testing of mecC-positive MRSA isolates. A well-characterized collection of mecC-positive S. aureus isolates (n = 111) was used for evaluation. Routinely used approaches were studied to determine their suitability to correctly identify mecC-harboring MRSA, including three (semi)automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems and five selective chromogenic agar plates. Additionally, a cefoxitin disk diffusion test and an oxacillin broth microdilution assay were examined. All mecC-harboring MRSA isolates were able to grow on all chromogenic MRSA screening plates tested. Detection of these isolates in AST systems based on cefoxitin and/or oxacillin testing yielded overall positive agreements with the mecC genotype of 97.3% (MicroScan WalkAway; Siemens), 91.9% (Vitek 2; bioMérieux), and 64.9% (Phoenix, BD). The phenotypic resistance pattern most frequently observed by AST devices was “cefoxitin resistance/oxacillin susceptibility,” ranging from 54.1% (Phoenix) and 83.8% (Vitek 2) to 92.8% (WalkAway). The cefoxitin disk diffusion and oxacillin broth microdilution assays categorized 100% and 61.3% of isolates to be MRSA, respectively. The chromogenic media tested confirmed their suitability to reliably screen for mecC-harboring MRSA. The AST systems showed false-negative results with varying numbers, misidentifying mecC-harboring MRSA as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. This study underlines cefoxitin’s status as the superior surrogate mecC-positive MRSA marker.



Entry filed under: Antimicrobianos, Bacterias, Bacteriemias, Epidemiología, Metodos diagnosticos, REPORTS, Resistencia bacteriana, Sepsis, Update.

mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Hiding in Plain Sight lytA Quantitative PCR on Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples for Detection of Pneumococcal Pneumonia among the Elderly


January 2018
« Dec   Feb »

Most Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: